Who Moved the Qibla?

by Lenna

A Jewish acquaintance asked a question and when he didn’t get the answer he wanted, he continued to press his point until he prompted me to research the topic and formulate a response. He asked me, “Why did Muhammad ﷺ  move the qibla from Jerusalem to Mecca?”

I first told him from an Islamic perspective, Muhammad ﷺ never set the location of the qibla. It was Allah ﷻ Who established the qibla in the first place. Allah ﷻ later changed the qibla during the Prophet’s lifetime before declaring the religion complete. For me, this was a good enough answer. But I soon realized my acquaintance thought he was holding a smoking gun, and he was not going to let me off the hook so easily.

The Accusation

A quick Google search revealed the moving of the qibla as “talking point” for critics of Islam. Here is the argument distilled in an article published on Answering Islam:

Throughout Muhammad’s ﷺ ministry he often tried to appease Jews and Christians in the hope of convincing them that he was a true prophet like the prophets of the Holy Bible. Some of the ways in which he went about it was by adopting certain Jewish or Christian practices such as fasting, purification rites, dietary restrictions etc. When he saw that the Jews and Christians were not embracing him, that they were not accepting his prophetic claims, Muhammad ﷺ turned against them and did away with some of these customs and practices he had originally adapted from them. ~Muhammad’s ﷺ  Changing of the Qiblah

From an Islamic perspective, Muhammad ﷺ adopted certain Jewish and Christian practices because the revelation he received was a continuation of the message received by his Jewish and Christian predecessors.

I do not dispute his assertion that the Prophet tried to spread the message of Islam to Jews and Christians. It was his mission to propagate the message of Islam to all mankind. I suspect if he had excluded the Jews, Christians, or both from his target audience, that also would have sparked criticism by Islam’s relentless detractors.

It is not true, as the article seems to imply, that all Jews and all Christians rejected Islam. Some of them became Muslims, and I’ve seen no evidence Muhammad ﷺ ever gave up and stopped preaching to Christians and Jews.

The article goes on to say:

“[Muhammad ﷺ] had also commanded Muslims to pray towards Jerusalem, the prayer direction of the Jews, but then rescinded this and told them to pray towards the Kabah in Mecca.”

Not exactly.

Early Muslims were not forced to choose between the Noble Sanctuary in Jerusalem and Ka’aba in Mecca. They were able to pray facing both simultaneously, as long as they remained in Mecca. The geographical location of the city made this possible:

… While he was in Mecca he faced Syria in prayer, and when he prayed, he prayed between the southern corner and the black stone, putting the Ka‘ba between himself and Syria… (The Life of Muhammad ﷺ: A Translation of Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, with introduction and notes by Alfred Guillaume [Oxford University Press, Karachi, tenth impression 1995], p. 135)

It was not until the Muslims were forced to flee Mecca and take refuge in Yathrib (Medina) that they had to face one or the other, Jerusalem or Mecca.

When they first arrived in Jerusalem, Muslims prayed facing Jerusalem, and continued to do so for months, until the revelation came to turn to Mecca instead.

Why Jerusalem? 

The Qur’an never established Jerusalem as the qibla in the first place. In fact, one of the “talking points” meant to diminish the importance of Jerusalem to Muslims is that the city is never explicitly mentioned in the Qur’an.

We know Muhammad’s ﷺ  preference was to pray facing Mecca (2:144).

So when Muhammad ﷺ arrived in Medina and was confronted with a choice between Jerusalem and Mecca, why did he continue to face Jerusalem? 

I have not yet found a definitive answer. However, it may be that Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was indeed observing a command from Allah ﷻ. Islam recognizes the Torah as divine revelation, along with Psalms and the Gospel.

From the Hebrew Bible:

Now when Daniel learned that the decree had been published, he went home to his upstairs room where the windows opened toward Jerusalem. Three times a day he got down on his knees and prayed, giving thanks to his God, just as he had done before.

Daniel 6:10-11


If thy people go out to battle against their enemy, whithersoever thou shalt send them, and shall pray unto the LORD toward the city [of Jerusalem] which thou hast chosen, and toward the house that I have built for thy name …

 I Kings 8:44

To recap, we know Muhammad ﷺ preferred Mecca but, nevertheless, continued to to pray facing Jerusalem when he arrived in Medina. We also know that observant Jews faced Jerusalem to pray before the advent of Islam, and still pray facing Jerusalem today.

Muhammad ﷺ may have continued to observe Allah’s ﷻ earlier command to pray facing Jerusalem until Allah ﷻ issued a superseding command, which is precisely the behavior we would expect from a prophet, who would never override God’s laws, regardless of his personal preferences.

Unintended Consequences

According to the article published on Answering Islam, the Jews themselves said they had directed Muhammad ﷺ  to face Jerusalem:

According to Yunus b. ‘Abd al-A‘la – Ibn Wahb – Ibn Zayd: The Prophet turned towards Jerusalem for sixteen months, and then it reached his ears that the Jews were saying, “By God, Muhammad ﷺ and his companions did not know where their Qiblah was until we directed them.” This displeased the Prophet and he raised his face toward Heaven, and God said, “We have seen the turning of your face to Heaven.”

(The History of Al-Tabari: The Foundation of the Community, translated by M. V. McDonald, annotated by W. Montgomery Watt [State University of New York Press (SUNY), Albany 1987], Volume VII, pp. 24-25; bold emphasis ours)

This inclusion has unintended consequences relevant to where the first command to face Jerusalem may have originated. Of course, this bit about Jews instructing Muhammad ﷺ  was not cited to bolster the case for his recognizing the earlier revelation.

Rather it was to imply Jewish ridicule was a probable catalyst for Muhammad ﷺ  to move the qibla:

Al-Tabari had no problem admitting that it wasn’t until Muhammad ﷺ heard the Jews making fun of him that he then decided to change his prayer direction.

Jewish Ridicule Theory

In a rebuttal of the same Answering Islam article, Bassam Zawadi says scholars agree the source of this “Muhammad ﷺ heard the Jews making fun of him” information is weak, but I would argue it doesn’t really matter.

Even if we accept the information, Al Tabari admitted no such thing! He merely reported Muhammad ﷺ had heard this gossip. He did not state this was the reason the qibla was moved. That is a leap the author made on his own.

There is no evidence ridicule was all, or even part, of the reason Muhammad ﷺ looked to the sky for answers. Qur’anic revelation was often a direct response to issues Muhammad ﷺ was facing at the time. Evidence suggests the Prophet’s dilemma regarding the qibla was ongoing once the Muslims arrived in Medina, until the matter was definitively resolved through revelation.

A Contradiction? 

Next the article on Answering Islam accuses Muhammad ﷺ of contradicting himself by directing the faithful to pray facing Jerusalem after the qibla was changed to Mecca, and provides misleading, cherry-picked evidence to support his claim:

On another occasion a man who prayed towards Mecca was corrected by Muhammad ﷺ and pointed him towards Jerusalem!

… ‘We went out with the polytheist pilgrims of our people having prayed and learned the customs of the pilgrimage. With us was al-Bara’ b. Ma‘rur our chief and senior. When we had started our journey from Medina al-Bara’ said, “I have come to a conclusion and I don’t know whether you will agree with me or not. I think that I will not turn my back on this building” (meaning the Ka‘ba), “and that I shall pray towards it.” We replied that so far as we knew our prophet prayed towards Syria and we did not wish to act differently. He said, “I am going to pray towards the Ka‘ba.” …We blamed him for what he was doing, but he refused to change. When we came to Mecca …we went to ask the apostle… Al-Bara’ said, “O prophet of God, I came on this journey God having guided me to Islam and I felt that I could not turn my back on this building, so I prayed towards it; but when my companions opposed me I felt some misgivings. What is your opinion, O apostle of God?” He replied, “You would have had a qibla if you had kept to it,” so al-Bara’ returned to the apostle’s qibla and prayed with us towards Syria. But his people assert that he prayed towards the Ka‘ba until the day of his death; but this was not so. We know more about that than they.’

(Ibid., p. 202; bold emphasis ours)

Crucial information is missing from this account. The following recounts the same story, with this preface:

Ibn Ishaq, one of the classical biographers of the Prophet related an interesting episode: While the Prophet was still in Makkah some people from Madinah had accepted Islam on one of them was al-Bara…..

Read the full account here: Virtues of Jerusalem: An Islamic Perspective

The qibla was not established as Mecca until after the Prophet’s arrival in Medina.

The entire point of the story is that Jerusalem was the qibla at the time, but al-Bara had a special reverence for Mecca and did not want to turn his back on the Kaaba. Absent the option to face both Jerusalem and Mecca, he prayed facing Mecca while the other Muslims were still facing Jerusalem. Therefore, this is no evidence of a contradiction on the part of the Prophet.

The Crux 

It seems the main point of the article published on Answering Islam is to cast doubt on the Qur’an as the word of Allah. If the Qur’an is flawed, then it is not divine and the whole Islamic paradigm falls apart.

If only the detractors could be so lucky! By the grace and majesty of Allah, they are not!

In his “concluding remarks,” which appear nowhere near the end of the article, the author writes:

Muslims must contend with these issues by either concluding that the Quran contains the human thoughts and expressions of Muhammad ﷺ , and is therefore not completely divine in origin. Or they must accept the fact that Allah ﷻ changed his mind and practices in order to placate Muhammad’s ﷺ desires and wishes, something which even the Quran itself asserts quite unapologetically:

O Muhammad ﷺ , many a time We noticed you turning your face towards heaven; now We will make you turn towards a Qiblah THAT WILL PLEASE YOU. Turn your face during Salah towards the Sacred Mosque (Ka’bah); wherever you are turn your face in that direction. The people of the Book know this to be the truth from their Rabb. Allah ﷻ is not unaware of what they do. S. 2:144 F. Malik

Cause and Effect?

The author offers a false choice based on a faulty premise.

The verse does not assert that Allah ﷻ changed his mind. For all we know, it was always the plan to establish the final qibla in Mecca, and nothing in my reading of the relevant text suggests otherwise.

Allah ﷻ did not indicate Muhammad’s ﷺ preference was the reason for His decision. He merely acknowledged that His decision would please Muhammad ﷺ. Big difference, as one if cause and effect and the other is simple observation.

Which Scholars?

The author also concludes:

In light of all of this, is it any wonder that many scholars and writers see the Quran’s abrogation of specific monotheistic practices in place of heathen customs and rites as evidence that the Quran is really the product of Muhammad ﷺ rather than a revelation coming from God?

Who are these “many scholars and writers”?

How does the Qur’an abrogate “monotheistic practices”?

Does one become a polytheist by praying to the same ONE GOD because he or she is facing a different direction?

The author never mentions the alleged “heathen customs and rites,” plural, so even if we accept that praying facing the Kaaba was one such practice, what are the rest of these “customs and rites”?


The article seems to be a jumble of half-formed thoughts, leaving me to wonder who the author is trying to convince. I don’t care even if it is true that “many scholars and writers” doubt the divine origin of the Qur’an. Islamic scholars do not doubt the divine origin of the Qur’an, and it doesn’t matter whether non-Muslim scholars do or not.

If non-Muslims scholars agreed it is divine revelation, I suppose they would be Muslims!

I don’t think Allah’s ﷻ decision to establish the final qibla in Mecca presents any challenges for Muslims. I doubt the qibla would have become an “issue” at all, were it not for a well-funded coterie of agenda-driven “critics” making mischief.

The straightforward answer to the question posed in the title of this article is that Allah ﷻ moved the qibla. And Muslims are fine with that.

Whatever good has come from me is due to Allah ﷻ and solely to Allah ﷻ. Whatever bad has come from me is from the whisperings of Shaytan, and from my own sins. All praise is due to Allah ﷻ, and may Allah’s ﷻ Peace and Blessings be upon His Final Messenger Muhammad ﷺ , his pure family, his noble companions, and all those who follow them with righteousness until the Day of Judgment. Ameen.

What did you think of this article? Let me know below in comments. You also reach me via email at lenncat@protonmail.com or find me on Twitter: @LennCat.


  1. Nothing can satisfy the whims and prejudices of people who hate Islam (fear Islam ?). Muhammad turned the qibla away from Jerusalem, because he wanted supremacy away from the Judic-Christian narrative i.e. the Quran his own word…OR the fact that the qibla was changed to Mecca is proof that Muslims should have nothing to do with Jerusalem….hence either way there is no pleasing the anti-islamic crowd.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, a no win situation when you’re facing an agenda-driving “critic.”

      Have you ever read any scholarly opinion that suggests Muhammad (saw) was observing the earlier command to pray facing Jerusalem?


      1. From what I know in my limited knowledge, it was a sense of establishing the same continuity of the Abrahamic Creed until the command did come to change the Qibla. There was not this absurdity of trying to ‘imitate the Jews’ as much as he could, until he wanted to go his own or the fallacy that he was discontinued from Divine accordance because he was asked to change the direction of prayer…either way there is no pleasing people who have had their minds made up.
        Mecca and Medina i.e. Yathrib are ‘holy cities’, but Jerusalem is not far off.
        I fact I do not like the particular hierarchy of making Jerusalem the third holiest city, it is holy as any. There are three holy cities, i.e. scared grounds, Mecca, the city of the scared stone (though with no worship veneration whatsoever), Mecca, the burial place of the Nabi and Jerusalem, the place where the Nabi was ascended into the Heavens AND where we share the creed of Abraham(p) with our Christian and Jewish brethren.

        Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem. it is this Triangle that Muslims should be focused on.
        I am not a theologian or a scriptural scholar, but the ramification of making Yərushəlem a side issue can be seen today, especially in the issue of Falsteen.
        Lastly…The World Will End in Jerusalem.

        …I will not cease from Mental Fight,
        Nor shall my Sword sleep in my hand:
        Till we have built Jerusalem…


  2. This was a very interesting and well written article. Thank you. Ultimately, however, arguing with people of other ‘faiths’ about which is THE correct way to face in prayer is useless, as the Qur’an points out.

    In 2:114-115, after mocking Jewish and Christian assertions of religious supremacy, it is insisted upon that ALL houses of worship (whether synagogues, churches, or mosques) are to be protected; and one has no business entering any such ‘house’ except in “fear of God” (verse 114). Then verse 115 makes this important statement:
    “And God’s is the east and the west: and wherever you turn, there is God’s countenance. Behold, God is infinite, all-knowing.” God is everywhere, so it doesn’t matter which direction you face; He is there.

    In the verses with which you were mainly dealing, verse 142 again asserts that “God’s is the east and the west”. Then in verse 148 appears this important statement: “for every community faces a direction of its own, of which He is the focal point. Vie, therefore, with one another in doing good works.” God is everywhere, and each ‘community’ has its own direction of prayer; God is the ‘focal point’ no matter which direction one faces! So quit fighting about which direction to face; if you must ‘fight’, struggle to see who can do more ‘good works’!

    Then in 24:35 and 36, a beautiful parable is given in which God is compared to an olive tree which is “neither of the east nor of the west”. The ‘oil’ from this ‘olive tree’ lights ‘lamps’ in all houses of worship throughout the world. The ‘houses’ are raised in His honor, and He is glorified in them ‘morning and evening”.

    Facing Mecca may be important to Muslims – and this Qibla was given to that ‘community’ by God – but don’t go getting those ideas of ‘supremacy’ which were mocked when practiced by Jews and Christians. Let them face their own ‘Qibla’, and don’t argue about it. East and West belong to God; whatever direction one faces, God is there!

    Isn’t the Qur;an beautiful???


    1. I do not think the writer is arguing with the Jews and Christians about what direction they face but the polemic that others use to discredit either the Nabi or the Quran in concerning in the direction upon which Muslims face to pray.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I very much agree, ‘Nicholas II’; and I believe ‘Lenna’ was quite clear about that in her presentation. It was no doubt I who was not clear in expressing my intent, especially in the final paragraph where I said: “but don’t go getting those ideas of ‘supremacy’ which were mocked when practiced by Jews and Christians.”

        My INTENT was not to criticize anything in the article (though I no doubt failed in clearly expressing my intent) but to paraphrase what I see as the meaning of the text of the Qur’an – which I find so delightful. It’s really the ‘critics’ such as “Answering Islam” who (deliberately?) miss this important message in the Qur’an by creating arguments about things which are ultimately inconsequential even from the Qur’an’s perspective.

        It’s been almost 5 years since I started ‘investigating’ Islam (January 2010). Initially I was simply seeking to determine if Islam really taught the “kill all infidels” doctrine of which it is accused. I really didn’t think it possible that Islam actually taught such nonsense; and since I went to the Qur’an and reputable Muslim resources, I quickly found out I was correct in that assumption. I then started writing articles in my blog to expose the falsehood of the anti-Islam crowd.

        I also started reading through the Qur’an (rather than just concentrating on those passages that deal with ‘fighting’), using initially the Muhammad Asad English version (giving me the benefit of some excellent explanatory footnotes). I was pleasantly ‘shocked’ to see that not only did the Qur’an NOT advocate killing people who didn’t follow the Prophet (Muhammad – peace to him and his family), but that it was very ‘liberal’ in its attitude toward other monotheistic religions (especially compared to the fundamentalist Christianity in which I was raised and which I had repudiated many years previously).

        This passage from sura 2 (vss. 142ff), and others containing references to “East and West” I found to be simply delightful. Even as instruction was being given concerning facing a particular direction in prayer (Mecca and the Ka’ba), it was made clear that the direction one faces is ultimately unimportant, and that God accepts the prayers of all who sincerely seek Him no matter which official ‘religion’ they adhere to, where in the world they are, and what direction they’re facing while praying. I then wrote an article (in October, 2011) entitled “The East and the West Belong to God” (http://mystic444.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/the-east-and-the-west-belong-to-god/) expressing this ‘shocked’ delight.

        So when I found ‘Lenna’s’ article, I just couldn’t keep from making a comment about this. But as I say, it was not intended to imply that I found her article argumentative in a bad way – despite how my poorly expressed wording may have made it sound.


    2. Welcome, Mystic.

      I’m confused by your comment. This article is a rebuttal addressing accusations against our Prophet. It’s not meant to address the “right or wrong” aspects of anyone else’s religion.

      In answer to your question, yes, the Qur’an is beautiful. 🙂


      1. And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. 2:23

        Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.